28 |
Klinisk Biokemi i Norden · 3 2019
Referanser
1. Institute CaLS. H20-A2-Reference leukocyte
(WBC) Differential Counts (Proportional) and
Evaluation of Instrumental Methods; Appro-
ved Standard-Second Edition. CLSI, Wayne,
PA.; 2007.
2. Barnes PW, McFadden SL, Machin SJ, Simson
E. The international consensus group for hema-
tology review: suggested criteria for action fol-
lowing automated CBC and WBC differential
analysis. lab Hematol. 2005;11(2):83-90.
3. Genevieve F, Galoisy A, Mercier-Bataille O,
Wagner-Ballon O, Trimoreau F, Fenneteau O,
et al. Smear microscopy revision: propositions
by Groupe Francophone d’Hématologie Cellu-
laire (GFHC). Feuillets de Biologie 2014;317:1-9.
Kurskomitéen var også engasjert i caseløsning på kurset. Foto: Helle B. Hager.
4. Zini G, d’Onofrio G, Briggs C, Erber W, Jou JM,
Lee SH, et al. ICSH recommendations for iden-
tification, diagnostic value, and quantitation of
schistocytes. Int J Lab Hematol. 2012;34(2):107-
16.
5. Eilertsen H, Hagve TA. Do the flags related to
immature granulocytes reported by the Sysmex
XE-5000 warrant a microscopic slide review?
Am J Clin Pathol 2014;142(4):553-60.
6. Eilertsen H, Vollestad NK, Hagve TA. The
usefulness of blast flags on the Sysmex
XE-5000 is questionable. Am J Clin Pathol
2013;139(5):633-40.
