2.SeglenPO. Evaluatianofscientists by journal impact.
In
RepresentationsofScienceandTechnology,Weingart
P, Sehringer R, Winterhager M, eds., DSWO Press,
Leiden, 1992; p. 240-252.
3. Seglen PO. The skewness of science.
J.
Am.
Sac.
Information Sci.
1992;43:628-638.
4.MoedHF, BurgerWJM, Frankfort JG,VanRaanAFJ.
The application of bibliometric indicators: important
field-and time-dependent factors to be considered.
Scientometrics
1985;8:177-203.
5. Hargens LL, FelmleeDH. Structural determinants of
stratification
in
science.
Am.Social.Rev.
1984;49:685-697.
6. Folly G, Hajtman B, Nagy JI, Ruff
I.
Some metho–
dologicalproblems in ranking scientistsbycitationanaly–
sis.
Scientometrics
1981 ;3:135-147.
Klinisk Kemi
i
Norden
2,
1995
7. Seglen PO. Bruk av siteringsanalyse og andre
bibliometriske metoder i evaluering av forsknings–
aktivitet.
Tidsskr. Nor. Laegeforen.
1989;31:3229-3234.
8. Seglen PO. How representative is the journal impact
factor?
ResearchEvaluatian
1992;2:143-149.
9. GordonMD. How authors selectjournals:A testofthe
reward maximization mode! of submission behaviour.
Social Studies ofScience
1984;14:27-43.
10. Seglen PO. Causa! relationship between article
citedness and journal impact.
J.
Am.
Sac.
Information
Sci.
1994;45:1-11.
11. Orettner B, Seglen PO, Sivertsen G. Inverkanstal
som fördelningsinstrument:Ej accepterat av tidskrifter i
Norden.
Läkartidningen
1994;91:744-745.
63
