7
| 2 | 2011
Klinisk Biokemi i Norden
avhengig av konsekvensene og i denne artikkelen er
kun diskutert enkelte smakebiter fra fagfeltet kunn-
skapsbasert medisin. Som hovedregel vil jeg, basert
kun på min sunne fornuft, foreslå; en større endring
i prosedyrer kan iverksettes dersom den er så godt
fundert at man, hvis man vil og finner det tilstrekkelig
interessant, kan publisere resultatet minimum i Klinisk
Biokemi i Norden.
Referanser
1.
Price CP, Christenson RH. Evidence-based
laboratory medicine. Principles, practice, and
outcomes. Second edition. AACC Press Wash-
ington DC, USA 2007.
2.
Lijmer JG, Mol BW, Heisterkamp S, Bonsel
GJ, Prins MH, van der Meulen JH, Bossuyt
PM. Empirical evidence of design-related
bias in studies of diagnostic tests. JAMA
1999;282:1061-6.
3.
Januzzi JL, van Kimmenade R, Lainchbury J,
Bayes-Genis A, Ordonez-Llanos J, Santalo-
Bel M, et al. NT-proBNP testing for diagnosis
and short-term prognosis in acute destabilized
heart failure: an international pooled ana-
lysis of 1256 patients: the International Col-
laborative of NT-proBNP Study. Eur Heart J
2006;27:330-7.
4.
Mol BW, Lijmer JG, Evers JL, Bossuyt PM. Cha-
racteristics of good diagnostic studies. Semin
Reprod Med 2003;21:17-25.
5.
Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP)
-
health-workforce/resources/critical-appraisals-
skills-programme/?searchterm=CASP (Acces-
sed April 2010).
6.
Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis
CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, et al. The STARD
statement for reporting studies of diagnostic
accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Ann
Intern Med 2003;138:W1-12.
7.
Guyatt GH, Haynes RB, Jaeschke RZ, Cook
DJ, Green L, Naylor CD, et al. Users’ Guides to
the Medical Literature: XXV. Evidence-based
medicine: principles for applying the Users’
Guides to patient care. Evidence-Based Medi-
cine Working Group. JAMA 2000;284:1290-6.
8.
McAndrew L, Schneider SH, Burns E,
Leventhal H. Does patient blood glucose
monitoring improve diabetes control? A sys-
tematic review of the literature. Diabetes Educ
2007;33:991-1011;
discussion 2-3.
9.
Martin S, Schneider B, Heinemann L, Lodwig
V, Kurth HJ, Kolb H, Scherbaum WA. Self-
monitoring of blood glucose in type 2 diabetes
and long-term outcome: an epidemiological
cohort study. Diabetologia 2006;49:271-8.
10.
Schutt M, Kern W, Krause U, Busch P, Dapp
A, Grziwotz R, et al. Is the frequency of self-
monitoring of blood glucose related to long-
term metabolic control? Multicenter analysis
including 24,500 patients from 191 centers in
Germany and Austria. Exp Clin Endocrinol
Diabetes 2006;114:384-8.
11.
Nagy E, Watine J, Bunting PS, Onody R, Oos-
terhuis WP, Rogic D, et al. Do guidelines for the
diagnosis and monitoring of diabetes mellitus
fulfill the criteria of evidence-based guideline
development? Clin Chem 2008;54:1872-82.
12.
Tricoci P, Allen JM, Kramer JM, Califf RM,
Smith SC, Jr. Scientific evidence underlying the
ACC/AHA clinical practice guidelines. JAMA
2009;301:831-41.
13.
Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, Eccles M, Falck-
Ytter Y, Flottorp S, et al. Grading quality of
evidence and strength of recommendations.
BMJ 2004;328:1490.
Foto: Henrik Alfthan
