Klinisk Biokemi i Norden Nr 3, vol. 28, 2016 - page 6

6 | 
Klinisk Biokemi i Norden · 3 2016
Foto: Helle B. Hager.
telefon kommer aldri på disse kursene. Det gjenstår
å se om telefonsamtalen vil ha noen effekt. Det er vel
optimistisk å tro at en enkelt telefonsamtale vil endre
så mye, men det føles i hvert fall godt å ha sagt ifra.
Det er vanskelig å styre bruken av det som tilsyne-
latende er uten restriksjoner eller kostnader. Bairds
tre regler for bruk av laboratorieprøver (5) kan ikke
gjentas for ofte:
• If you ask a stupid question, you get a stupid answer
• Laboratory testing is for sick people
• Too many good tests are the same as one bad test
Referanser
1. Lang T. National Minimum Re‐testing Inter-
val Project. A final report detailing consensus
recommendations for minimum re‐testing
intervals for use in Clinical Biochemistry.
Assoc Clin Biochem 2013:1-31.
2. Waldron JL, Ford C, Dobie D, Danks G,
Humphrey R, Rolli A, et al. An automated
minimum retest interval rejection rule reduces
repeat CRP workload and expenditure, and
influences clinician-requesting behaviour. J
Clin Pathol 2014;67:731-3.
3. Lippi G, Brambilla M, Bonelli P, Aloe R,
Balestrino A, Nardelli A, et al. Effectiveness
of a computerized alert system based on re-
testing intervals for limiting the inappropria-
teness of laboratory test requests. Clin Biochem
2015;48:1174-6.
4. Larsson A, Biom S, Wernroth ML, Hulten G,
Tryding N. Effects of an education programme
to change clinical laboratory testing habits
in primary care Scand J Prim Health Care.
1999;17:238-43.
5. Baird G. The laboratory test utilization
management toolbox. Biochemia medica.
2014;24:223-34.
1,2,3,4,5 7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,...48
Powered by FlippingBook