Klinisk Biokemi i Norden Nr 2, vol. 26, 2014 - page 35

KliniskBiokemi i Norden · 2 2014
 | 35
References
1. AmericanSociety forQuality.TheASQGlobal
State of Quality. Discoveries 2013.
.
org/global-state-of-quality/reports.aspx(Cited
November 2013).
2. GarverMS. Listening to customers.MidAm
J Bus 2001;16:41-54.
3. CrowR,GageH,HampsonS,Hart J, Kimber
A,StoreyL, etal.Themeasurementof satisfac-
tionwithhealthcare: implications forpractice
from a systematic review of the literature.
HealthTechnolAssess 2002;6:32.
4. LombartsMJ, Rupp I,VallejoP, SunolR,Kla-
zingaNS.Applicationofquality improvement
strategies in389Europeanhospitals: resultsof
theMARQuIS project. Qual Saf HealthCare
2009;18:i28-i37.
5. Greaves F, PapeUJ, KingD, Darzi A,Majeed
A, Wachter RM, et al. Associations between
internet-based patient ratings and conventio-
nal surveysofpatientexperience in theEnglish
NHS:n an observational study. BMJQual Saf
2012;21:600-5.
6. Bardach NS, Asteria-Penaloza R, Boscardin
WJ, Dubley RA. The relationship between
commercial website ratings and traditional
hospital performance measures in the USA.
BMJQual Saf 2013;22:194-202.
7. KingA,Daniels J,Lim J,CochraneDD,Taylor
A, Ansermino JM. Time to listen: a reviewof
methods to solicit patient reports of adverse
events.Qual SafHealthCare 2010;19:148-57.
8. Ward JK, Armitage G. Can patients report
patient safety incidents in a hospital set-
ting? A systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf
2012;21:685-99.
9. Finnish Standard Association. SFS-EN ISO/
IEC17025. General requirement for the com-
petence of testing and competence. Helsinki:
TheAssociation; 2005.
10. Finnish Standard Association. SFS-EN ISO
15189.Medical laboratories. Particular requi-
rement for quality and competence.Helsinki:
TheAssociation; 2007.
11. Finnish Standard Association. SFS-EN ISO
15189:en.Medical laboratories. Requirements
for quality and competence (ISO15189:2012).
Helsinki: TheAssociation; 2013.
12. BoyntonPM,GreenhalghT. Selecting, desig-
ning, and developing your questionnaire.
BMJ 2004;328:1312-5.
13. Graham B. Developing a questionnaire.
2nd Ed. London: Continuum International
PublishingGroup 2007:15-6.
14. Kelley K, Clark B, Brown V, Sitzia J. Good
practice in the conduct and reporting of
survey research. Int J Qual Health Care
2003;15:261-6.
15. OjaPI,KouriTT, PakarinenAJ. From custo-
mer satisfaction survey to corrective actions
in laboratory services inauniversityhospital.
Int JQualHealthCare 2006;18:422-8.
16. OjaP, Kouri T, PakarinenA. Health centres’
view of the services provided by a university
hospital laboratory: Use of satisfaction sur-
veys. Scand JPrimHealthCare2010;28:24-8.
17. Oja PI, Kouri TT. Pakarinen AJ. Utilisation
of customer feedback in auniversityhospital
laboratory.AccredQualAssur2009;14:193-7.
18. Oja PI, Kouri TT, PakarinenAJ. Reacting to
spontaneous feedback from external custo-
mers in a university hospital laboratory.
AccredQual Assur 2010;15:415-20.
19. Reason JT.Understandingadverseevents: the
human factor. In:VincentC (ed)Clinical risk
management: enhancingpatient safety. Lon-
don: BMJ PublishingGroup 2001:9-30.
20. International Organization for Standardiza-
tion. ISO/TS 22367. Medical laboratories –
Reductionof errors through riskmanagement
and continual improvement. Geneva: The
Organization; 2008.
21. National Association of TestingAuthorities,
Australia. Gap analysis of ISO 15189:2012
and ISO 15189:2007 in the field of Medical
Technology.
-
download/publications/Guidance_informa-
tion/checklist-worksheets-site-notification-
forms/Gap-analysis-15189.pdf (CitedNovem-
ber 2013).
22. IrishNationalAccreditationBoard. Summary
of changes in ISO15189:2012compared to the
2007version.http://www.inab.ie/media/Sum-
mary%20of%20changes%20for%20ISO%20
15189.pdf (CitedNovember 2013).
1...,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34 36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,...52
Powered by FlippingBook